I guess this is probably about as good as softcore gets. Jenna Jameson Untamed (hardly!) has enough posing and primping to keep you busy for several evenings. Its ultimate downfall, of course, is that it's softcore. You'll see almost this much T and A during an average afternoon of MTV, but the ladies here are hot, make no mistake.
I won't even bother breaking down all the scenes for you since there are so many (9 chapters composed of 3-4 mini-scenes each plus 3 sets of bonus scenes from other Vivid softcore titles), but Jenna's in enough of them to keep you happy. Hotties like Felecia, Celeste and Asia Carerra also make appearances, along with a brunette who I'm almost positive is Cassidey. I'm 95% sure it's her. And she's the hottest little gal in the nation, yessireebob. None of the girls see much action - no men in this movie - and you're lucky to glimpse a nicely trimmed camel toe. Boobs abound, but most of us are used to boobs. Other highlights include a penis made of clay and a girl with sparkly nipples. Just go into this one pretending it's an extra long R-rated music video and you'll be fine. I'd like to say this one would be good to get your own lady fired up, but she'll find little of interest here since it's very guy-geared.
I hate the menu interface on Untamed, just like I hated the it in another Jenna softcore I watched. You can't just play the whole movie through - you instead have to select from the main 9 chapters and then skip through the mini-scenes. When the chapter is over, it's back to the menu. Kind of silly, if you ask me and I couldn't find any credits at all. There's an interview with Jenna and enough bonus material to push this title higher than the last softcore I watched, but...it's softcore. Also: if you've seen other Jenna softcore flicks, you might notice some recycled scenes and music on Untamed!
Does JENNA JAMESON UNTAMED sound like it's
right up your alley? Buy it on
DVD
Cooter the counting cactus says that you are smutmonkey number 5898 to read this Rancho Review. DATE POSTED: 06-07-2002
Reader comments
|